My blog posts have been few and far between lately, but that
does not mean my genealogy has been put aside. As of late, I have devoted my
time to thinking and reading.
I was forced to pause when I discovered a family tree on
Ancestry.com that claimed the same 1870 and 1880 census records for William and
Ellen Dooley family. This discovery rattled me, as I was confident in my
decision-making, however, it forced me to pause and rethink the William and
Ellen Dooley evidence.
Here were two Dooley families headed by a William and Ellen.
Their children’s names and ages were similar with one exception.
My William and
Ellen Dooley’s youngest son was David Francis Dooley who eventually married
Elizabeth Lawless. David and Elizabeth were childless. This was a blessing, as
they later became guardians for their orphan niece and nephews.
“The Other Dooley Family Tree” had a William and Ellen
Dooley whose youngest son was David Joseph Dooley who married a Martha Schultz.
David Joseph and Martha raised a large family of eight children.
CONFLICT!
How do I discern which tree has correctly claimed these two
census records? I checked and double-checked the evidence of both trees and I eventually
found the flaw! William and Ellen Dooley’s firstborn son, Stephen C, held the
clue.
My Stephen C. Dooley married Sarah “Sadie” Hayes and
together they had one daughter, Sadie. Eventually, Stephen and Sadie parted
ways. Stephen remained in Chicago while the “Two Sadies” moved to Detroit. This information is confirmed in
Stephen C. Dooley’s obituary and through a living Dooley relative. I know this
is true.
“The Other Dooley Family Tree” also claimed Stephen C. Dooley
and his “Two Sadies.” They cannot possibly belong in “The Other Dooley Family
Tree” along with David Joseph and Martha Schultz
as they are firmly planted in my Dooley Family Tree.
It took quite a bit of time to compare both trees, but I am
glad I did. I can say with complete confidence that I have correctly claimed
the 1870 and 1880 U.S. census records for William and Ellen Dooley.
No comments:
Post a Comment